BREAKOUT SESSIONS

Saturday afternoon, Nov. 3, 4:00-5:00 (7 concurrent sessions)



Saturday afternoon, Nov. 3, 4:00-5:00

5

Laura McGough

Multidisciplinary Specialist, National Endowment for the Arts


QUESTION
The notion of art-science collaboration suggests partnerships not only between individual artists and scientists, but also among the facilities and organizations that support, exhibit, and service both fields. What is the role, if any, of universities and arts organizations in facilitating artist-scientist collaborations?

REPORT
Laura McGough was absent from the session, but the group decided to meet anyway to discuss the topic of the role of arts organizations and universities in facilitating artist-scientist collaborations. After a round of introductions, we discussed the history of the start of the Wellcome Trust and The Arts Council of England. SCIART held competitions bringing artists and scientists together. We discussed funding for the arts as opposed to funding for the sciences and stated that the scale of the funding is the biggest difference. The differences between funding in the US and funding in other countries was also discussed. There is more public awareness built into the programs in the UK compared to the US. The places where scientists and artists collaborate in the US, such as M.I.T.?s Media Lab, have a corporate audience, but no public audience.

Reported by Allison Waxberg

Laura McGough is a curator, media artist and arts administrator. She currently serves as the Multidisciplinary Specialist at the National Endowment for the Arts in Washington, DC. Prior to this, she organized video, film, new media and visual arts exhibition for arts organizations in the US and Canada including Hallwalls Contemporary Arts Center and Washington Project for the Arts/Corcoran. Her articles on video, cyberfeminism, new media and performance have appeared in Sculpture, New Arts Examiner, inContext, geekgirl, FUSE and experimenta.

http://www.arts.gov

Laura McGough
Multidisciplinary Specialist
National Endowment for the Arts
Room 703
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20506
Ph: 202.682.5400
mcgoughl@arts.endow.gov



Saturday afternoon, Nov. 3, 4:00-5:00

6

Diana Meckley

composer, writer/editor, arts administrator, researcher


QUESTION
In both art and science, innovation is very often the unintended result of a creative/investigative process. Do you think these "accidental breakthroughs" are more apt to be amplified or hindered in interdisciplinary collaborative partnerships? Does it make a difference whether the collaboration is product-based (with or without a definite time-frame for completion) or a more theory-based, ongoing process?

The first topics of discussion included some definitions of innovation in solo and collaborative models. Ms. Meckley brought up the point that, as illustrated by earlier presentations, the development of the collaborative partnership itself constitutes a kind of innovation. Dialogue ensued about innovation in working methods and pairings of people.

REPORT
In conversation about the New Paradigm of art integrated with society we talked about different types of innovation that happen in art and science. The distinction between incremental building of a product, process of paradigm vs. breaking through (the so called "creating out of nothing") nature of paradigm shifts in art and science was the first topic of engaged dialogue. In this context the ongoing identity crisis of artist was questioned. The role of the artist in society that includes a change in the sense of responsibility - and belonging. On the other hand, most professions are experiencing an identity crisis.

A real question can be what kind of growth do people care about? And how can that growth lead to real collaboration that is not funding or product driven. What do they want to accomplish when they choose to collaborate? Examples of collaboration that do not have a specific product in mind brings more innovations coming from a free flowing processes; innovations for community.

The session was closed with a quote from John Cage: "I find myself more committed, the more diverse and multiplied my actions and interests become."

Diana Meckley is a composer, writer/editor, arts administrator, and researcher, whose work over two decades reflects her interest in the interfaces between art, science, and technology. Meckley received her B.A. in English (Minor, Biology), continuing graduate work at NYU in Music Composition. Her compositions range from those for electronically-processed speech to string quartet. Major grants/commissions include those from NYSCA, Mary Flagler Cary Charitable Trust, Meet the Composer, New Radio and Performing Arts, and Arts Midwest. She has participated in and helped conceptualize a number of conferences/symposia focusing on art+science, emerging art forms, and interdisciplinary collaboration and has developed curricula on the historical and current impact of technology on artistic creation/presentation. Meckley serves on the Board of Directors of ASCI, the Board of Advisors of Harvestworks, Digital Media Arts, and is a charter member of the Electronic Music Foundation.

dimeckley@earthlink.net



Saturday afternoon, Nov. 3, 4:00-5:00

7

Damian Murphy

lead engineer, Dewhurst Macfarlane and Partners


QUESTION
Many architectural/artistic visions do not succeed through undirected interpretation. Collaboration with all naturally occurring elements and those created by man are required for success. Structural engineering is a study of elements and application of materials. The art of engineering requires empathy of vision, subtlety of application and directive for creation; how do these elements interact?

REPORT
- Collaboration breakdown, where do you go for help when it occurs?
- Must be firm commitment of vision and goals between artist and scientist.
- Many projects do not succeed due to undirected interpretation.
- When dealing with art/architecture collaborations consideration of materials is especially important.   These materialscombined with ideas help turn the vision into reality
- Takes a complex language to facilitate the movement of vision to creation.
- Flow of communication must be continual throughout project, not just initial stages.
- We also collaborate with ourselves. Various parts of ourselves debate possibilities of the project.


Reported by Louis Grenier.

Damian Murphy is a Senior Associate with Dewhurst Macfarlane and Partners Inc, Structural Consultants, and leader of a technical group providing the type of interaction and service required for intricate architecture and art installations utilizing different materials, including glass and stainless steel. These services help turn the vision into reality, through understanding the refinement required for the detailing of the structure and the nature of the commercial ventures undertaking the installation. He has presented projects and design solutions at international conferences for consultants. Dewhurst Macfarlane and Partners provide consulting services to clients internationally, including; Brian Clarke, James Carpenter Design Associates, Vito Acconci, Rafael Vinoly Architects, Architectural Glass Art, Rachel Whiteread, Vong Phaophanit and Anish Kapoor.

http://www.dewmac.com/index.htm

Damian Murphy
Senior Associate
Dewhurst Macfarlane and Partners Inc.
45 East 20 Street
New York, NY

<< PREVIOUS    NEXT >>